[pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: "George T. Cox" <georgetcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2004 02:58:30 -0500
Thanks Scott.
--
=====
GTCox
=====
--
Scott McNay wrote:
>Hi George,
>
>
>Just like COM1-4, you must have a server running on those ports in order
>for someone to "hack in".
>
>And if LPT1 is hooked up to your printer, there's not likely to be any
>hacking going on.
>
>
>
>
>Based on what I've read, I would guess that NONE of the Lexmark stuff
>that starts up automatically needs to be there for most people.
>Uncheck all of the LEX* or LX* stuff so that it doesn't run anymore,
>restart your computer, make sure that the stuff still isn't running,
>and try printing something.
>
>
>
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- References:
- [pchelpers] (no subject)
- From: George T. Cox
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: George T. Cox
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: Scott McNay
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: ??
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » (no subject) - Gerald Gollinger
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject) - John Durham
- [pchelpers] (no subject)
- From: George T. Cox
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: George T. Cox
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: Scott McNay