[pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: "George T. Cox" <georgetcox@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2004 23:38:47 -0500
All I know is I was told back in '99 that the printer port can be used
as doorway to hack into someone's computer because like COM1- 4 it is a
communications port.
Lexmark has spyware on my system that is constantly trying to phone
home. I would like to find the offending file and rename or delete it.
Tonight when I made a rule stopping my computer from communicating with
a Lexmark site that I didn't tell it to go to, I got a lot of ICMP and
UDP activity from that site.
The SpoofStick for Firefox told me that, while I thought I was at
Toast.net, the site I was looking at was really IM2COOL.COM.
What it all means I don't know. I thought you guys could tell me.
--
=====
GTCox
=====
--
John Durham wrote:
>Secure it? The only place anyone can gain access to the things on your
>LPT1 port is your own PC, or a fastlynx connection on it. All such stuff
>is directly under your control. I have never heard of this before. Could
>you describe it a little more please?
>
>
>
>
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- References:
- [pchelpers] (no subject)
- From: George T. Cox
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: John Durham
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: ??
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » (no subject) - Gerald Gollinger
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject) - John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: Ekhart GEORGI (last name last)
- [pchelpers] (no subject)
- From: George T. Cox
- [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- From: John Durham