[pchelpers]
- From: "Bob & Ellen Mickelson" <letitsno@xxxxxx>
- To: "pchelpers" <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:55:10 -0500
I'd like to know what the advantage is of running two anti virus programs and
is that even a good idea? Doesn't that take a ton of resources? Do any of you
guys run two different programs?
I have Norton Corporate version and am looking at Avast 4 home. Do I even NEED
two? Is that twice the protection.....as in: What one doesn't get, the other
one will? Or what?
curious...
Ellen
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 05:08:55 +0100
- From: Billyus
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:33:52 -0500
- From: rweyer
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers] Re: ?????
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] Re: ??
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » (no subject)
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject)
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers]
- » [pchelpers] (no subject)
- » (no subject) - Gerald Gollinger
- » [pchelpers] Re: (no subject) - John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: [pchelpers]
- From: John Durham
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 05:08:55 +0100
- From: Billyus
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2003 11:33:52 -0500
- From: rweyer