[pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- From: "Jacqueline MacWhirter" <jmacwhirter@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2003 12:28:50 -0800
Hi Joe:
If you are getting the error-- did you try to optimize-- it will put
certain files on your harddrive so your cdrom won't keep initicializing all
the time that's is for WTLIB99-- the 20001 you can copy the whole program on
your hardrive. Did you make a shortcut it does like to have the name renamed
too much.
Is this a new version 2001 or the 99 version ?-- maybe someone on the list
knows how to do a little conversion or maybe a person who has windows xp or
the pro can give you some ideas? It might be your Windows XP I know the
Professional is quite different than the standard copy Do you know anyone
at Bethel they are usually quite good in adapting to these things-- I know
when I got my WT99 mine bursted in my cd rom --because it had a nic in the
collar-- it came like that they were extremely helpful but again I got some
relatives there<G> These are just some suggestions you could try out if you
are really stuck. Have a great day-- Jackie
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe V" <icejoe1973@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 8:57 AM
Subject: [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
>
>
>
> I have NTFS on my Windows 2000 and XP PCs. The CD installs fine. It just
> when I execute WTLIB.EXE. It gets the error a CD-ROM Drive is needed for
> application to run.
>
>
>
>
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://pchelpers.5er.com?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- From: Joe V
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- » [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- [pchelpers] Re: Wtlib and W2k
- From: Joe V