[pchelpers] Re: Relatively technical article on software patents in the USA

It's long and technical as you said. No wonder I gave up patenting 
things years ago. Do you think they will get the spaghetti unraveled 
before the dish goes cold?

Scott McNay wrote:

>Hi folks,
>
>http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dltr/articles/2005dltr0012.html
>
>
>Even Bill Gates recognized that software patents may prove to be
>problematic when, in 1991, he stated in a memorandum:
>
>   "If people had understood how patents would be granted when most of
>   today's ideas were invented, and had taken out patents, the
>   industry would be at a complete standstill today. . . . I feel
>   certain that some large company will patent some obvious thing
>   related to interface, object orientation, algorithm, application
>   extension or other crucial technique."5
>
>...In 1991, when Bill Gates made his remarks, Microsoft had fewer than
>50 filed patent applications; today Microsoft has over 4,000 issued
>patents and more than 10,000 pending patent applications.7
>  
>
-- 
Regards, John Durham <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
ICQ number 112663246
Fax/Phone 64 4 5286786
Award winning web site at http://modecideas.com?sig
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/index.html?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.




-- 
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.

Other related posts: