[pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- From: "Nigel Lemmon" <nigel.lemmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 13:50:14 +1300
There's probably not much to tell, except that wireless networking is
exactly the sane as wired networking, except that you don't have wires! You
have a network device in each computer and go from there.
The technology is relatively new and there are a number of gotchas, as Bob
has already said. You may experience intermittent connections, etc.
Your original question was "is there an alternative?" and I replied, yes,
there is.
I would recommend spending the money on a router, network cards and cable.
It will be very reliable, easier to set up and manage, and give you faithful
service with the bonus of being able to expand the system easily.
Nigel
----- Original Message -----
From: "Billyus" <billy.e@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Can you give me a "brief" run down on this Nigel?
> Billy
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Nigel Lemmon" <nigel.lemmon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: Monday, December 30, 2002 10:06 PM
> Subject: [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
>
>
> >
> > Yep. Wireless networking.
> >
> > Nigel
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.434 / Virus Database: 243 - Release Date: 25/12/2002
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://pchelpers.5er.com?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.
- References:
- [pchelpers]
- From: Billyus
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- From: Nigel Lemmon
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- From: Billyus
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- » [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- [pchelpers]
- From: Billyus
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- From: Nigel Lemmon
- [pchelpers] Re: (No Date: Tue, 31 Dec 2002 11:11:30 +1300
- From: Billyus