[pchelpers] Re: Linux riskier than Windows?

The big MS (remember them)? They are the ones currently suffering in the 
browser wars.

Lindsay wrote:

>Who did you say funded this research John?
>
>On Thu, 2005-03-24 at 07:48 +1200, John Durham wrote:
>  
>
>> By  Robert Lemos,  CNET News.com
>>Published on ZDNet News: March 22, 2005, 4:56 PM PT
>>
>>Companies face greater risks if they run their Web sites on Linux rather 
>>than Windows, a Microsoft-funded study has concluded.
>>
>>Last year, Web servers based on Windows Server 2003 had fewer flaws to 
>>fix than those based on Red Hat Enterprise Linux ES 3 in a standard 
>>open-source configuration, researchers said in a paper released on Tuesday.
>>More here:
>>http://news.zdnet.com/2100-1009_22-5630822.html?tag=nl.e589
>>
- 
Regards, John Durham <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
ICQ number 112663246
Fax/Phone 64 4 5286786
Award winning web site at http://modecideas.com?sig
Order my latest e-book at http://modecideas.com/dmaxhits.htm?sig
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.




-- 
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.

Other related posts: