[pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: "Bevan Edwards" <bevan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 28 May 2002 22:53:01 +1200
Hi Jon,
Ok, well Microsoft Outlook IMO means Internet Mail Only mode, apparently.
As for the winmail.dat attachment, that's nothing to do with the file,
that's Microsoft Exchange's Rich Text Information, which encodes attributes
such as boldface, underline, fonts, and colours. These attachments are only
formatting and not important to the message itself.
It sounds like the body of the message might in fact be very large,
especially since the File | Save Attachments option is disabled.
Are you able to forward the e-mail to me directly (bevan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx), if
it's not sensitive or personal information, and I could let you know if
there's another attachment lurking in the background somewhere?
Regards,
Bevan
---
Bevan Edwards mailto:bevan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Achieve Software Limited http://www.achieve.co.nz
Phone: (64-9) 444-4210 ICQ: 732011
Fax: (64-9) 444-4201
Mobile: (64-21) 979-603
----- Original Message -----
From: "Yamaha Jono" <yamaha_jono@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 11:28 PM
Subject: [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bevan Edwards" <bevan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
> >
> > What e-mail program did they use to send the message?
>
>
> It's showing as
> X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO
> build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
>
> > Also, click on the Message Source button to see if you can find anything
> > that specifies what type of encoding was used.
>
>
> with regards the mp3 "attachment" it says
> Content-Type: application/ms-tnef;
> name="winmail.dat"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
> Content-Disposition: attachment;
> filename="winmail.dat"
>
> thanks again for your patience! Jon
>
>
>
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Yamaha Jono
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Yamaha Jono
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Bevan Edwards
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Yamaha Jono
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- » [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Yamaha Jono
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Yamaha Jono
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Bevan Edwards
- [pchelpers] Re: Invisible Attachments
- From: Yamaha Jono