[pchelpers] Re: Firefox 1.0.1

That was 'we' in the plural sense of excellence EG.  Common in English
especially if we really think we are.

On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 16:08 +0200, Ekhart GEORGI (last name last) wrote:
> >>Are you talking with the royal "we" now, or did i insult someone else by 
> >>asking for less creativity in reading directions?
> > 
> > Oh how sweet he called me Royal....flattery will get you know where bud!
> 
> No, you got it backwards, as usual. This one was not flattery; it was 
> poking fun at you for using "we" to talk about yourself LOL
> 
> 
> 



-- 
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.

Other related posts: