[pchelpers] Re: Escartis

I gotta echo Pen here Scott; "...in a face to face conversation one does not
have to hear the conversation twice to answer it."
Why do we need to read what was already said first when we are probably
following the thread and have already seen that part of the 'conversation'.
Referencing it AFTER the most current piece makes logical sense I think. Why
rehash?

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Scott McNay" <wizard@xxxxxxxx>
: Hi Ed,
: Sunday, July 31, 2005, 9:41:15 AM, you wrote:
: e> I would suggest that people put their reply to a post at the top
: e> and what they are referencing below that.
:
: Why do you want it that way?
:
:
: e> Otherwise if it ain't broke...
:
: A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
: Q: Why is top posting frowned upon?



-- 
-------list-services-below-----------
Regards, John Durham (list moderator) <http://modecideas.com/contact.html?sig>
Freelists login at http://www.freelists.org/cgi-bin/lsg2.cgi
List archives at http://www.freelists.org/archives/pchelpers
PC-HELPERS list subscribe/unsub at http://modecideas.com/discuss.htm?sig
Latest news live feeds at http://modecideas.com/indexhomenews.htm?sig
Good advice is like good paint- it only works if applied.

Other related posts: