[pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: "tactilelady" <penwal1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:37:02 -0700
What no smiley face scott?????
Pen
> If you want your computer to be completely secure, remove the phone line
> or network cable, as well as the CD-ROM drive and floppy drive.
>
> --Scott.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Inge
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 7:17 AM
>
> All right! All right, I got it.
>
> I did look at the web sight and it did look like real to me. I was not
> interested in their products. I am on line all the time and get
> automatic updates from Norton. I should be fine.
>
> Now I have another question. I have Windows XP and it does have a
> build-in firewall. Yesterday I received the following email:
>
> "Here is a story about a program that keeps the worms away from your
> address book. It comes from a computer newsletter called " Lockergnome"
> "And for those of you worried about worms, it looks as though Ben Brady
> has created something just for you: "Well, I have finally gotten fed up
> with all of the script kiddies and virii that are going around stealing
> people's email addresses... so what did I do? I've created a new
> program to take care of the problem. Secure Address Book! It uses an
> encrypted database to store your email contact information so that virii
> and email worms that are so prevalent on the Internet cannot steal your
> contact information to propagate Now you can continue to use Outlook
> Express or any other email client and keep your email and contact
> information safe. Once you import your email contact information via a
> .CSV file that you export from your existing address book (which you can
> then empty) all you have to do to send an email to someone is simply
> restore the Secure Address Book from your system tray, highlight the
> contact in the browse and click on the send button. Up pops a new
> message screen ready for your email content. It works with any email
> client you can set up as your default email program." The name "Secure
> Address Book" is suppose to be a click-able link to the website that has
> the program and information about it. If the link didn't carry over,
> here it is again. http://www.y2kbrady.com/firewallreporting/ Ben Brady
> is the creator of the program and the owner of the website. Pc"
>
> What do you think about the address book and the additional Firewall
> software for Windows XP? Any idea?
>
> Thank for your help.
> Inge
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: pchelpers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:pchelpers-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Scott McNay
> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2002 8:03 AM
> To: pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
>
>
>
>
> Clarification: BitDefender is ok, but one of their examples (where they
> describe the variations of K L E Z) looks like they are talking about
> their own product, not K L E Z. Personally, if they're going to let
> their web pages be sloppy like that, I'd avoid them on general
> principles; their programming might be equally sloppy.
>
> Ed is right; if you already have a good antivirus program that is up tto
> date, and use some common sense, you don't need to worry about other
> programs. Sadly, many people lack both updated antivirus software and
> common sense, and are thus a burden and danger to everyone else.
>
> --Scott.
>
>
> ---
> Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
> Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
> Version: 6.0.368 / Virus Database: 204 - Release Date: 5/29/2002
>
>
>
>
- Follow-Ups:
- [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: Scott McNay
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: Scott McNay
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: Scott McNay
- [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: Scott McNay