[pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: "Ed" <edwest@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <pchelpers@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 08:15:02 -0400
Thank you, Scott.
I agree that their website is a bit confusing. Because of the way the
Bitdefender website is constructed I was looking for previous experience
from others on them.
I believe more than enough has been posted here to protect everyones 'puter
as best as can be done. But attention must be paid & followed through with
to get that protection.
Thanks,
Ed
> Clarification: BitDefender is ok, but one of their examples (where they
> describe the variations of K L E Z) looks like they are talking about
> their own product, not K L E Z. Personally, if they're going to let
> their web pages be sloppy like that, I'd avoid them on general
> principles; their programming might be equally sloppy.
> Ed is right; if you already have a good antivirus program that is up tto
> date, and use some common sense, you don't need to worry about other
> programs. Sadly, many people lack both updated antivirus software and
> common sense, and are thus a burden and danger to everyone else.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.371 / Virus Database: 206 - Release Date: 6/14/02
- References:
- [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: Scott McNay
Other related posts:
- » [pchelpers] Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender
- » [pchelpers] Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- » [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- [pchelpers] Re: Bitdefender?
- From: Scott McNay