[pcductape] Re: FW: [PC-Ductape] Batch conversions - it works

  • From: "Ctm007" <ctm007@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <pcductape@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2003 06:00:00 -0500

Hi Pam,

I see what you mean.   I guess the issue for me is "how important" is the
original photo v disk space.   I guess I had better keep my son's wedding
pictures as an original format.   :-)   Btw, he works where you were and it
is top secret and he never talks about his job.


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Pam" <ltf01@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: <pcductape@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:35 PM
Subject: [pcductape] FW: [PC-Ductape] Batch conversions - it works

> Yikes, I sent this to topica without realizing it.  Topica balked at the
> attachments and bounced it back to me.  =(
> Here goes again.
> Pam
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Pam [mailto:ltf01@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 10:30 PM
> To: pcductape@xxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [PC-Ductape] Batch conversions - it works
> Technically, yes.  But you will lose quality when you resize it back up.
> The degree of quality will depend on the quality of the original image,
> much you reduce the size, what compression rate you choose, and then how
> much you increase the size back to.
> To give you an example of what I mean, attached are 3 pics, the original
> DCP_3586, reduced 50% DCP_3586reduced50, and the 3rd image is the reduced
> image blown back up to its original size.  Compare the quality of the 2
> images.
> The pic, btw, was taken a couple of weeks ago at NASA in Houston.  It is
> the original Mission Control room, which is no longer in service as of
> year.  It is now deemed a historical thing. We weren't allowed to view or
> even know the location of the new Mission Control room.
> Pam

To unsubscribe from this list send an email to
pcductape-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
OR by logging into the Web interface. 

Other related posts: