[passcoalition] Re: from Barbara
- From: Gene Bourquin DHA <oandmhk@xxxxxxx>
- To: PASS listserv <passcoalition@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 19:33:38 -0500
Thanks Maria. I did not know about this. Theoretically, this sounds great.
I guess the intent is to influence to DOT to make better and more justifiable
decisions. In practice, I wonder if there will be any positive impact.
Perhaps the more politically astute among us can comment.
Gene
Dr. Eugene
A Bourquin
_____________________________
DHA, COMS, CI & CT,
CLVT
Support deafblind children in Guatemala!
Go to www.FRIENDSofFUNDAL.org
Visit: http://www.bourquinconsulting.com/
> From: mhansen1@xxxxxxx
> To: passcoalition@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [passcoalition] from Barbara
> Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:18:12 -0500
>
>
> You may very well know this already but the City Council passed Int. No. 377
> A , now law Number 2011/014, which requires the Department of Transportation
> to explain why it rejected certain requests for traffic control devices. If
> a community board or Council member requests, say, a stop sign and DOT
> rejects
> that request, DOT must send a summary of the federal warrants it used to
> guide its decision, along with the date and time it collected the traffic
> data.
> The community board or Council member may then request that DOT send them a
> summary of any traffic study it conducted. I think this could be of help
> in our campaign for APS.
>
> Warm regards to you and Frisco,
>
> Barbara
>
>
>
Other related posts:
