Re: wierd performance problem
- From: "Jared Still" <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracledbaquestions@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2008 18:01:07 -0700
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Dba DBA <oracledbaquestions@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I am going to try to respond to several emails in one post.
>
>
> 4. we did do a few million deletes, but its a relatively small number of
> deletes relative to the size of the table
If the deletes were from blocks at the top of the table, that could cause
your 2 second wait, as
your query is scanning the table until it gets data.
>
> 5. I did large insert selects across a db link that died several times and
> rolled back. I think that may be the problem. Lots of fragmentation. lost
> connection across the database link after pulling many GBs of data. so I
> made my pulls smaller (got less data with each call).
If so, the blocks allocated are retained, even if the data was not
committed.
> 6*. I am currently running an alter table shrink space operation to see if
> this fixes the problem*
That won't help. Your queries are not reading that part of the datafile.
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
- References:
- wierd performance problem
- From: Dba DBA
- wierd performance problem
- From: Nigel Thomas
- Re: wierd performance problem
- From: Dba DBA
Other related posts:
- » wierd performance problem
- » Re: wierd performance problem
- » Re: wierd performance problem
- » Re: wierd performance problem
- » wierd performance problem
- » RE: wierd performance problem
- » Re: wierd performance problem
- » Re: wierd performance problem
- » RE: wierd performance problem
- » Re: wierd performance problem
- » Re: wierd performance problem
- wierd performance problem
- From: Dba DBA
- wierd performance problem
- From: Nigel Thomas
- Re: wierd performance problem
- From: Dba DBA