Re: user_part_tables
- From: Paul Baumgartel <paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 15:44:49 -0400
Where are you getting the view source?
(Repost to evade the over-quoting snare).
On 4/27/05, Bill Coulam <bcoulam@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This question probably applies to other data dictionary views as well.
>=20
> Ordinarily, if a view has a column named "PARTITIONING_TYPE", I expect
> to find, in the view's source, a column or alias that reads
> "partitioning_type". Instead, I see unnamed derived columns, and named
> columns, that seem to be magically transformed to different names that
> show up in user_part_tables.
>=20
> Which brings me to my question: What makes the magical column name
> transformation happen? What piece of this puzzle am I missing?
>=20
--=20
Paul Baumgartel
paul.baumgartel@xxxxxxxxx
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: user_part_tables
- From: jame tong
- References:
- user_part_tables
- From: Bill Coulam
Other related posts:
- » user_part_tables
- » RE: user_part_tables
- » Re: user_part_tables
- » RE: user_part_tables
- » Re: user_part_tables
- Re: user_part_tables
- From: jame tong
- user_part_tables
- From: Bill Coulam