undo_retention and manual RBS
- From: "David" <thump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 13:14:05 -0800 (PST)
If were using Manual UNDO(RBS), then undo_retention has no relevance,
is'nt that correct?
--
..
David
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: undo_retention and manual RBS
- From: Ruth Gramolini
- References:
- RE: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes
- From: Gogala, Mladen
- Re: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes
- From: Richard Foote
Other related posts:
- » undo_retention and manual RBS
- » RE: undo_retention and manual RBS
- » RE: undo_retention and manual RBS
- RE: undo_retention and manual RBS
- From: Ruth Gramolini
- RE: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes
- From: Gogala, Mladen
- Re: separate tablespaces for tables and indexes
- From: Richard Foote