RE: tnsManager Vs OID
- From: "Vishal Gupta" <vishal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>, <Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:30:05 -0000
I am beginning to like tnsManager. I did not knew about this utility.
But i think it does everything which one might expect it do in a
enterprise class environment. And its simple enough in its
implementation. Kudos to Andy Barry.
- Provides high availability implementation by allowing multiple
tnsManager instances.
- Allow automatic synchronization between different tnsManager
instances.
I dont know how it scales in terms of scalability. If performance is all
right then its perfect.
Regards,
Vishal Gupta
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jared Still
Sent: 25 October 2009 15:31
To: Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: jifjif@xxxxxxxxx; sundarmahadevan82@xxxxxxxxx;
Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: tnsManager Vs OID
Ditto.
Oracle Names was indeed superior to OID for naming purposes.
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
Oracle Blog: http://jkstill.blogspot.com
Home Page: http://jaredstill.com
On Sun, Oct 25, 2009 at 5:43 AM, Goulet, Richard
<Richard.Goulet@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
They did, it was called ONames till some BOZO convinced them that LDAP
was the future.
Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA/NA Team Lead
PAREXEL International
________________________________
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ~Jeff~
Sent: Sunday, October 25, 2009 3:52 AM
To: sundarmahadevan82@xxxxxxxxx; Oracle-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: tnsManager Vs OID
tnsManager just uses a tnsnames.ora file , no database required.
Its a shame Oracle didn't make OID so elegantly simple!
2009/10/25 sundar mahadevan <sundarmahadevan82@xxxxxxxxx>
From Alan's reply, Am I correct in understanding that OID requires an
oracle database for names resolution. But with respect to tnsManager,
I do not think it requires a database.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 7:28 PM, Guillermo Alan Bort
<cicciuxdba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Plus you get the basic memory footprint of an Oracle Database... I
don't
> reckon you will need much memory... but at least 200MB...
>
> cheers.
> Alan Bort
> Oracle Certified Professional
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts: