Re: streams capture performance

Madhu

Here are a few more. Is there a separate ARCH process for
switching the logs to arch or is the LGWR over burdened? Do you
have any table with > 125 columns?

Recommended Patches for Streams  437838.1

Bug 6017440 - Streams capture / CDC / apply slow mining DMLs for
tables with REFRESH ON COMMIT Materialized Views
  Doc ID:  Note:6017440.8

Bug 5881229 - AV capture is slow    Doc ID:  Note:5881229.8

Bug 5370578 - Capture process slow on startup on 'control file
sequential read'
Doc ID:  Note:5370578.8

Bug 5135907 - Streams capture slow when object definition is not
in dictionary
Doc ID:  Note:5135907.8

Streams Capture Process Takes a Long Time To Start With State
'Dictionary Initialization' and Wait Event 'Control File
Sequential Read'
Doc ID:  Note:406673.1

Streams Capture Process Running Extremely Slowly With 'CPU Time'
as the Top Wait Event
  Doc ID:  Note:458214.1

HTH

GovindanK

On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:38:54 -0500, "Madhu Sreeram" <[1]madhusreeram@gmai
l.com> said:

 Yes the note#335516.1 as well as many other documents in
metalink under the "streams" knowledge browser.
Note#365648.1  seems to be relevant only for apply. I have looked
at the output of Health check specified in #273674.1 but nothing
obvious.
I have only one capture process running (there is just one
capture queue), however I set the parallelism to 4 (using:
dbms_capture_adm.set_parameter) but found no improvement with the
default (=1) .
The latency has stayed mostly the same and I do see that log
miner is processing archives constantly.
-Madhu S
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 7:23 PM, GovindanK
<[2]gkatteri@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

When you said Best Practice Docs did you mean Metalink Note #
335516.1 ?

Did you look at Note:365648.1 , 273674.1 ; How many capture
process are running? Does the difference always stay at 12 hrs or
it picks up sometime?

GovindanK

References

1. mailto:madhusreeram@xxxxxxxxx
2. mailto:gkatteri@xxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: