RE: stdby and Oracle licensing

Mark refers to my post of June 21/25 last year:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/06-2005/msg00954.html

Best regards,

Carel-Jan Engel

===
If you think education is expensive, try ignorance. (Derek Bok)
===

On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 14:33 -0800, David wrote:

> I'm referring to the standby piece specifically.  I'm clear on failover
> and don't think that has changed.
> Has the standby agreement changed or have I just been clueless this long.
> I have even posed thi to ORacle sales last year and was told:  "Standby is
> covered under EE and has no additional cost"
> 
> Now, it costs additional EE licenses under the same model to cover both
> servers...
> Did'nt always used to be like that I'm quite sure.

Other related posts: