Re: standards
- From: Nuno Souto <dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2004 21:54:11 +1000
Raj Jamadagni apparently said,on my timestamp of 5/08/2004 9:24 PM:
> I use it on a regular basis in certain code of mine (on production database
> that runs 24x7) when I
> DON'T want the exception to kill the processing.
>
not to mention Forms programs. Mighty handy when in-line select statements (not
in an explicit begin/end block) start to give off more than one row...
Flogging? ah well, each to his taste on these things.... :)
> --- david wendelken <davewendelken@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>How about:
>>
>>PL/SQL Programmers who use exception blocks like this will be flogged, then
>>fired from their
>>job.
>>
>>EXCEPTION
>> WHEN OTHERS THEN
>> NULL;
>>END;
>>
>>:)
>
--
Cheers
Nuno Souto
in sunny Sydney, Australia
dbvision@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- Re: standards
- From: Raj Jamadagni
Other related posts:
- » standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » Re: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » RE: standards
- » Re: standards
- Re: standards
- From: Raj Jamadagni