RE: sqlldr unrecoverable clause and archive_log
- From: "John Dunn" <jdunn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "'Paul Drake'" <bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 16:18:51 +0100
8.1.7
-----Original Message-----
From: Paul Drake [mailto:bdbafh@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 April 2005 16:09
To: jdunn@xxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: sqlldr unrecoverable clause and archive_log
version?
On 4/18/05, John Dunn <jdunn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Can someone please explain what redo is generated by sqlldr direct path
> when unrecoverable is specified but archive logging is on. The sqlldr
> documentation seems to suggest that the amount of redo generated depends
> upon whether archive logging in set on or not.
>
> I have a scenerio where a sqlldr directp path load is taking far longer on
a
> system with archive logging set on then one where archive logging is
> on...could archive logging be the problem?
>
> John
>
> --
> //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
--
#/etc/init.d/init.cssd stop
# f=ma, divide by 1, convert to moles.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
