Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- From: hrishy <hrishys@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: Phil Singer <SingerM0n@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, peter.mclarty@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:52:05 +0000 (GMT)
Hi Phil
Thank you for your inputs.
My application is web based so i would be using
connection pooling and the locking there would be
different (wherein i would use a timestamp or
something to see if a row is changed) and then do the
dml.
Do you think i should still be concerned about this
difference in behaviour
regards
Hrishy
--- Phil Singer <SingerM0n@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Peter McLarty wrote:
> > Its not that it is impossible, but if I was going
> to do it I would
> > firstly have GOLD support with MS, because when
> things go wrong you
> > might just wish you had it.
> > You need a very well architected application, that
> is written to handle
> > the idiosyncrasies of SQL Server locking, or you
> will constantly have
> > issues with it. There is a new feature called read
> consistent snapshot
> > that I would recommend, that should alleviate it
> somewhat.
>
>
> Once again, I would _dearly_ love someone who
> actually understands SS
> Snapshot Versioning to explain it's pros and cons in
> Oracle terms.
> Because the little bit that I have been able to
> understand suggests that
> it is nothing more than a timebomb waiting to go
> off, with M$'s blessing.
>
> That's a little too harsh without some expansion.
> As I understand it,
> this feature is supposed to work just like Oracle's
> undo segments.
> Except that it is not controlled at the database
> level, but at the
> session level. The question is, what would happen
> if you got two
> sessions going at the same time, with one announcing
> "I'm using snapshot
> isolation" and the other saying 'Go ahead, I'm
> not!'?
>
> More of my understanding: if this causes bad things
> to happen, M$'s
> position is, that it's all your fault.
>
>
>
> ----------------------
> Phil Singer |
> SingerM0n@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 6216 Kevin in Beautiful Brighton | Just 7 hairpin
> turns
> "OCP, PhD, and all-around Good Guy | north of
> Hamburg
>
_______________________________________________________
Juggling multiple email accounts? Why bother? Consolidate them all in Yahoo!
Mail with our quick, easy tool.
http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/mail/trueswitch_overview
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- From: Peter McLarty
Other related posts:
- » sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- » Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- Re: sql server2005 for a change in 3TB range
- From: Peter McLarty