RE: shutdown abort warnings

Appreciate the feedback, and will ignore the paper as it seems obviously close 
to a decade old.   Points taken away for either not removing the paper, 
updating it, or not being more specific to include dates and versions at a 
minimum.   However it has to be Oracle 8 at the latest.

 

Joel Patterson 
Database Administrator 
joel.patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx 
x72546 
904  727-2546 

________________________________

From: Jared Still [mailto:jkstill@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2008 3:37 PM
To: Patterson, Joel
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: shutdown abort warnings

 

This is a rather old paper:

The author is "currently working on a Y2K implementation project for the city 
of Tulsa, OK."




On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 11:46 AM, <Joel.Patterson@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


I was reading (and contributed my .02£), to the forum discussion awhile ago 
concerning shutdown abort yet came across this advice and warnings of possible 
corruption still being advertised.

Does this lend credit to the institution, or take points away?  The leanings 
where very much favorable to abort with much in depth analysis.

http://www.embarcadero.co.uk/resources/tech_papers/oracleorphan.pdf

If so, one wonders....  (not that I have any intention of utilizing there 
services in the first place... it is simply academic).

--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l






-- 
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist

Other related posts: