RAC and CHEAP create a great collision!If you use RAC either for HA or for scaling, you are in regions where CHEAP will not fit. So why not save the (little) money for a non-RAC, but rock solid solution?
What's your goal behind the idea?(I don't want to offend you, I just have to fight the 'cheak' ideas of my management too often)
regards, Martin -- Martin Berger http://berx.at/
I am planning a cheap RAC solution based on Red hat Enterprise 4 Linux (or oracle unbreakable Linux) .I get some hints from Jeff Hunter's storage solution, but i am not sure if it a stable one, and also the performance?Do anyone else implement such kind of "cheap" RAC setup with a very nice storage solution?What is your concern while you choose it ?