Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga
- From: Andreas Piesk <a.piesk@xxxxxxx>
- To: veeeraman@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 19 Aug 2010 23:47:09 +0200
Ram Raman schrieb: > Querying shared_pool_reserved view after the bounce an hour ago shows us > that the request failures is 28. Our sga target is 4.5Gb now. i had a similar problem some time ago. which part of shared_pool grows? -ap -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga
- From: Ram Raman
- Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga
- References:
- shared_pool_reserved_size and sga
- From: Ram Raman
- shared_pool_reserved_size and sga
Other related posts:
- » shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Ram Raman
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Tim Gorman
- » RE: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Taylor, Chris David
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Ram Raman
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Andreas Piesk
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Ram Raman
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Andreas Piesk
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Ram Raman
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Ram Raman
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Andrew Kerber
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Tim Gorman
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - Andreas Piesk
- » Re: shared_pool_reserved_size and sga - David Roberts