Re: shared database sequence.
- From: Maxim Demenko <mdemenko@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gints.plivna@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 17:46:33 +0100
Gints Plivna schrieb:
In case you need not to get overlapping values you can simply define
one sequence with values starting from 1 to very big number and the
other from the very big number till very big number * 2
Or the other with just start with -1 increment by -1
Of the overlapping sequences is not the case, then what is the problem?
Gints Plivna
http://www.gplivna.eu
Simply varying start with and increment by should do that equally well -
1st : start with 1 increment by 2
2nd: start with 2 increment by 2
Similarly can be done for generating unique numbers among more than 2
servers.
Best regards
Maxim
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- shared database sequence.
- From: Syed Jaffar Hussain
- Re: shared database sequence.
- From: Gints Plivna
Other related posts:
- » shared database sequence.
- » RE: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » RE: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » RE: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » RE: shared database sequence.
- » RE: shared database sequence.
- » RE: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
- » Re: shared database sequence.
In case you need not to get overlapping values you can simply define one sequence with values starting from 1 to very big number and the other from the very big number till very big number * 2 Or the other with just start with -1 increment by -1 Of the overlapping sequences is not the case, then what is the problem? Gints Plivna http://www.gplivna.eu
- shared database sequence.
- From: Syed Jaffar Hussain
- Re: shared database sequence.
- From: Gints Plivna