Re: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- From: Joe Armstrong-Champ <joseph.armstrong-champ@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:06:38 -0400
Mark,
I did that but I don't see how it guides me to the size of the shared
pool. For example, I ran it against a test db and got the following results:
PARAMETER VALUE USAGE
----------------------------- ----- -----
session_cached_cursors 100 35%
open_cursors 255 15%
2 rows selected.
CURSOR_CACHE_HITS SOFT_PARSES HARD_PARSES
----------------- ----------- -----------
92.17% 6.69% 1.14%
1 row selected.
MAX_CACHEABLE_CURSORS
---------------------
186
1 row selected.
It looks like my session_cached_cursors is too high according to the
above but how do I determine the increase to the SP from this?
Joe
Bobak, Mark wrote:
> Joe,
> Go to:
> http://www.ixora.com.au/scripts/library.htm
> and look for the session_cursor_cache.sql script.
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- From: Bobak, Mark
Other related posts:
- » session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » Re: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » Re: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » Re: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » Re: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » Re: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- » RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- RE: session_cached_cursors pros & cons
- From: Bobak, Mark