RE: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA

From: "Lex de Haan" <lex.de.haan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <thomas.mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, <Ethan.Post@xxxxxx>, "'Pete Sharman'" <peter.sharman@xxxxxxxxxx>, "'Christian Antognini'" <Christian.Antognini@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 19:38:51 +0200

you don't have the faintest idea about the size and complexity of Oracle's
regression tests,
and the frequency they run with ... bug-free software is an utopia.
kind regards,

Lex.
 
---------------------------------------------
Visit my website at http://www.naturaljoin.nl
---------------------------------------------

-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)
Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 19:27
To: 'lex.de.haan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; Ethan.Post@xxxxxx; 'Pete Sharman'; 'Christian
Antognini'
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA

Wait a minute.  You say that they *do* regression testing?  Are you sure?
Have you seen the list of bugs?

Maybe they only do *gression* testing - you know - a half-assed job.



--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Follow-Ups:

Re: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA
From: Mladen Gogala

References:
- RE: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA
  - From: Mercadante, Thomas F (LABOR)

RE: rm RULE based optimizer != GOOD IDEA

Other related posts: