Re: replace or translate?
- From: Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: dba.orcl@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:26:00 -0800
On Fri, 11 Feb 2005 09:24:53 -0500, Sami Seerangan <dba.orcl@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Thanks to Bill and everyone who responded.
>
> I ran a test case on 10M rows (do have complex strings) with two
> nested REPLACE calls vs. a simple TRANSLATE. The result is opposite to
> yours.
>
> Replace took 13 mins
> Translate took 20 mins
>
Which test did you run first?
Did you run them multiple times?
Was the DB cache hot or cold?
--
Jared Still
Certifiable Oracle DBA and Part Time Perl Evangelist
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Sami Seerangan
- References:
- RE: replace or translate?
- From: Knight, Jon
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Sami Seerangan
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Bill Coulam
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Sami Seerangan
Other related posts:
- » replace or translate?
- » RE: replace or translate?
- » Re: replace or translate?
- » Re: replace or translate?
- » Re: replace or translate?
- » RE: replace or translate?
- » Re: replace or translate?
- » Re: replace or translate?
- » Re: replace or translate?
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Sami Seerangan
- RE: replace or translate?
- From: Knight, Jon
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Sami Seerangan
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Bill Coulam
- Re: replace or translate?
- From: Sami Seerangan