RE: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- From: "Mercadante, Thomas F \(LABOR\)" <Thomas.Mercadante@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <hkchital@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2006 09:08:23 -0400
This is bad! I have a development database where each programmer has
their own copy of the schema. And they run the same version of the
application code.
Luckily I'm still on 9i. I guess we ain't going to 10g any time soon.
--------------------------------------------------------
This transmission may contain confidential, proprietary, or privileged
information which is intended solely for use by the individual or entity to
whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby
notified that any disclosure, dissemination, copying or distribution of this
transmission or its attachments is strictly prohibited. In addition,
unauthorized access to this transmission may violate federal or State law,
including the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1985. If you have
received this transmission in error, please notify the sender immediately by
return e-mail and delete the transmission and its attachments.
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hemant K Chitale
Sent: Thursday, September 28, 2006 9:00 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
Note 392673.1 is quite frank, quite honest. No beating about the bush
there.
Hemant K Chitale
http://web.singnet.com.sg/~hkchital
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- From: Hemant K Chitale
Other related posts:
- » re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- » Re: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- » RE: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- » RE: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- » Re: re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- re Bug 5458753 -- see Note 392673.1
- From: Hemant K Chitale