Re: raid 5 disaster

> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:31:59 -0700, jared.still@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <jared.still@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > See, SarbOx doesn't have to be completely dull and boring.  :)
> 
> ah but how do we trust the perl that you wrote to produce the
> spreadsheet - couldn't all that abstruse code be hiding a multitude of
> sins. I think we need an audit of the perl that lies behind the
> spreadsheet of the information for the audit...
> 
> qui custodiet ipsos custodes
> 
Yes, we keep going down that road.

I wrote the database test restore procedures.

So, mgt decides to have the backup admin try it out.

Of course, he can't do it without me guiding him, just as I can't
rebuild his servers without his help.  There is a certain level
of knowledge assumed in this kind of documentation.

SarbOx leads to very strange conundrums.


Jared


----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to:  oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Other related posts: