Re: raid 5 disaster
- From: Jared.Still@xxxxxxxxxxx
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 14:25:47 -0700
> On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:31:59 -0700, jared.still@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <jared.still@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > See, SarbOx doesn't have to be completely dull and boring. :)
>
> ah but how do we trust the perl that you wrote to produce the
> spreadsheet - couldn't all that abstruse code be hiding a multitude of
> sins. I think we need an audit of the perl that lies behind the
> spreadsheet of the information for the audit...
>
> qui custodiet ipsos custodes
>
Yes, we keep going down that road.
I wrote the database test restore procedures.
So, mgt decides to have the backup admin try it out.
Of course, he can't do it without me guiding him, just as I can't
rebuild his servers without his help. There is a certain level
of knowledge assumed in this kind of documentation.
SarbOx leads to very strange conundrums.
Jared
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
