Re: raid 5 disaster
- From: Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 13 Aug 2004 21:58:08 +0100
On Fri, 13 Aug 2004 13:31:59 -0700, jared.still@xxxxxxxxxxx
<jared.still@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> See, SarbOx doesn't have to be completely dull and boring. :)
ah but how do we trust the perl that you wrote to produce the
spreadsheet - couldn't all that abstruse code be hiding a multitude of
sins. I think we need an audit of the perl that lies behind the
spreadsheet of the information for the audit...
qui custodiet ipsos custodes
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.niall.litchfield.dial.pipex.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: raid 5 disaster
- From: Jared . Still
- References:
- RE: raid 5 disaster
- From: Jared . Still
Other related posts:
- » raid 5 disaster
- » RE: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » RE: raid 5 disaster
- » RE: raid 5 disaster
- » RE: raid 5 disaster
- » RE: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » RE: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » RE: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- » Re: raid 5 disaster
- Re: raid 5 disaster
- From: Jared . Still
- RE: raid 5 disaster
- From: Jared . Still