Re: rac question

  • From: Dan Norris <dannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: andrew.kerber@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2008 09:26:13 -0500

I suppose nothing "special" except that you'll have very few options for allocating resources between the two database instances on each node in the cluster. This is why I personally strive for a single RAC instance on each node of the clusters I deal with. In most cases, people are using RAC for their most sensitive, mission-critical application, so it's usually relatively easy to make the argument for finding somewhere else to put the "other" databases. This usually provokes a discussion about whether the database(s) in question *really* are mission-critical or not. Or, alternatively, consolidate them into a single database where some resource allocation can be made.

This problem is really not much different than putting multiple single-instance databases on a standalone, non-clustered server.

Dan

Andrew Kerber wrote:
Do you mean two different two-instance databases?  Yes, its possible. Nothing really special to worry about it.

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:55 AM, ed lewis <eglewis71@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Hello,
    In a 2-node cluster is it possible to have 2 Rac Clusters,
installed on the 2 servers ? If so, any issues to consider.
 
        thanks
 
ed  



--
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'
-- //www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: