Re: question about dbms_syste.set_sql_trace_in_session
- From: Mladen Gogala <mladen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 3 Mar 2004 11:30:05 -0500
I know that, but the DBA doesn't have to learn about oradebug and events any
more.
If only oracle would come up with DBMS_DISEMBOWEL_OPTIMIZER to replace 10053.
On 03/03/2004 10:51:11 AM, Tanel Põder wrote:
> > So, event 10046 is no longer necessary, the tracing mechanism can do that
> with the usual SQL_TRACE.
>
> The "usual SQL_TRACE" is event 10046 at level 1 :)
>
> Tanel.
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at //www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at //www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Other related posts:
