RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 09:58:56 -0700
I already said in an earlier post (possibly on a different subject) that I
am biased against changing O_I_C and particularly O_I_C_A, especially in
light that it has gained almost silver bullet status. Every post in a
metalink forum or on c.d.o.s about performance of a sql gets at least one
response suggesting lowering O_I_C_A as a solution. For me it is just
another flavour of the folly that views all FTS as evil and index access as
good.
OK, I step down from the soap box. I do not have experience with Oracle 9
in a production environment, so I have not had a chance to test it for
real, but Joze Senegacnik (joze.senegacnik@xxxxxx) seems to have had
several clients with Oracle 9 and reports good experience with it.
As for "blowing up in ones face", if you think system_stats may be
dynamite, I would consider O_I_C_A<100 nitroglycerine.
At 08:55 AM 3/5/2004, you wrote:
Hi wolfgang
I actually asked dan fink about this at UKOUG, because I haven't seen any
investigations into system stats anywhere, do you have some evidence,
links etc looking into the use of system stats anywhere? It instinctively
sounds a good idea to me, but one that has the capability of blowing up in
ones face. I don;'t like explosions much - I do like trying to do things
the right way.
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
Audit Commission
+44 117 975 7805
> -----Original Message-----
> From: breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: 05 March 2004 15:04
> To: breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
>
>
> If you are using Oracle 9, forget about O_I_C_A and O_I_C
> (i.e. leave them
> at their default) and use dbms_stats.gather_system_stats
>
> My 0.014938 cents (Canadian currency)
>
Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Jonathan Lewis
- References:
- RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Niall Litchfield
Other related posts:
- » optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
I actually asked dan fink about this at UKOUG, because I haven't seen any investigations into system stats anywhere, do you have some evidence, links etc looking into the use of system stats anywhere? It instinctively sounds a good idea to me, but one that has the capability of blowing up in ones face. I don;'t like explosions much - I do like trying to do things the right way.
Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA Audit Commission +44 117 975 7805
> -----Original Message----- > From: breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: 05 March 2004 15:04 > To: breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx; oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching > > > If you are using Oracle 9, forget about O_I_C_A and O_I_C > (i.e. leave them > at their default) and use dbms_stats.gather_system_stats > > My 0.014938 cents (Canadian currency) >
---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------
- Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Jonathan Lewis
- RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Niall Litchfield