Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:04:38 -0700
If you are using Oracle 9, forget about O_I_C_A and O_I_C (i.e. leave them
at their default) and use dbms_stats.gather_system_stats
My 0.014938 cents (Canadian currency)
At 07:30 AM 3/5/2004, you wrote:
Oracle support(without knowing anything about my system) is telling me to
use the following settings:
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING = 50
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ = 5
Tom Kyte's book effective Oracle by Design recommends starting
optimizer_index_caching at my cache/hit ratio and adjusting as needed.
Tim Gorman's paper 'Search for Intelligent Life in the Cost-Based
Optimizer' states that OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ should be set between 10
and 50 for most OLTPs.
This is a hybrid system, but I only have the OLTP parts to stress test(the
other parts are still in early phase development). Does anyone have any
opinions on this?
Wolfgang Breitling
Oracle7, 8, 8i, 9i OCP DBA
Centrex Consulting Corporation
http://www.centrexcc.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Larry Elkins
- References:
- optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: ryan.gaffuri
Other related posts:
- » optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING = 50 OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ = 5
Tom Kyte's book effective Oracle by Design recommends starting optimizer_index_caching at my cache/hit ratio and adjusting as needed.
Tim Gorman's paper 'Search for Intelligent Life in the Cost-Based Optimizer' states that OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ should be set between 10 and 50 for most OLTPs.
This is a hybrid system, but I only have the OLTP parts to stress test(the other parts are still in early phase development). Does anyone have any opinions on this?
---------------------------------------------------------------- Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com ---------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line. -- Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/ FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html -----------------------------------------------------------------
- RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Larry Elkins
- optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: ryan.gaffuri