optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: <ryan.gaffuri@xxxxxxx>
- To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 9:30:54 -0500
Oracle support(without knowing anything about my system) is telling me to use
the following settings:
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_CACHING = 50
OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ = 5
Tom Kyte's book effective Oracle by Design recommends starting
optimizer_index_caching at my cache/hit ratio and adjusting as needed.
Tim Gorman's paper 'Search for Intelligent Life in the Cost-Based Optimizer'
states that OPTIMIZER_INDEX_COST_ADJ should be set between 10 and 50 for most
OLTPs.
This is a hybrid system, but I only have the OLTP parts to stress test(the
other parts are still in early phase development). Does anyone have any
opinions on this?
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Tim Gorman
Other related posts:
- » optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » RE: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- » Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- Re: optimizer_index_cost_adj and optimizer_index_caching
- From: Tim Gorman