Re: optimizer_ ???
- From: Wolfgang Breitling <breitliw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 07:31:32 -0600
No, the assumption that every index - or even non-index - read will be a
"physical" IO is not one of the fallacies I talk about in my "Fallacies"
presentation.
Niall Litchfield wrote:
> On 4/26/05, Peter Alteheld <palteheld@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> That all said I do think that *if you are setting up a system* it is
> probably sensible and entirely justifiable to set OIC to some
> relatively high figure (80s or 90s) - in other words to correct one of
> (Wolfgangs?) fallacies - that every index read will be a physical IO.
> I suspect that setting system stats is the right thing to do instead
> of setting OICA.
>
--
Regards
Wolfgang Breitling
Centrex Consulting Corporation
www.centrexcc.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: optimizer_ ???
- From: Christian Antognini
- RE: optimizer_ ???
- From: Peter Alteheld
- Re: optimizer_ ???
- From: Niall Litchfield
Other related posts:
- » optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » RE: optimizer_ ???
- » Re: optimizer_ ???
- RE: optimizer_ ???
- From: Christian Antognini
- RE: optimizer_ ???
- From: Peter Alteheld
- Re: optimizer_ ???
- From: Niall Litchfield