Re: ok this sounds crazy BUT, is it a bug
- From: Martin Klier <usn@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2009 17:58:03 +0200
Hi Joe,
TESTAJ3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx schrieb:
> Here is parameter on primary:
>
> log_archive_dest_2 string service="testdg2", LGWR
> ASY
> NC NOAFFIRM delay=1
> OPTIONAL c
> ompression=DISABLE
> max_failure
> =0 max_connections=1
> reopen=
> 300
> db_unique_name="testdg2" n
> et_timeout=30
> valid_for=(onli
> ne_logfile,primary_role)
>
Did you check the frequency of log archiving against your 50-minute-delay?
What happens if you ALTER SYSTEM SWITCH LOGFILE manually, does it catch
up then?
Because one explanation that buzzes up and down my head says: "If you
delay on primary, you are not in real time apply anymore, you are on
archiver log shipping now."
Regards
Martin Klier
--
Usn's IT Blog for Linux, Oracle, Asterisk
http://www.usn-it.de
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
