Re: offtopic: Infrastructure Solutions architect - any good ?

I also commonly see the solutions architect role being somewhat responsible
for capacity planning and sizing the target environment properly. From a
technical perspective, this usually requires significant knowledge about the
application and/or database and oftentimes is more art than science from
what I've witnessed.

Dan

On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:50 PM, MacGregor, Ian A. <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

> The architect is involved in  putting together what machines are needed for
> a project,  what OS  they should run,  what application server should be
> used,   and what database management system   He is mainly a collector if
> information.  However if the OS team wants to run LINUX and the database
> team wants to run Solaris,   he would make the decision on which way to go.
>
> The architect has too look at all the projects and design a cost-effective
>  strategy for them all.   He is usually not i  the chain of command, but has
>  the power to make decisions as discussed above.
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, <Laimutis.Nedzinskas@xxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > I ment a job title. where does this this guy stand  in a command chain
> and
> > what good does he produce. Architect sounds like a person who knows a lot
> > but nothing in particular.
> >
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
> >
> > --
> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
> >
> >
>
> --
> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>
>
>

Other related posts: