Re: offtopic: Infrastructure Solutions architect - any good ?

Here is your problem ...'with an MBA'.  Not exactly helpful for someone in a
technical job..

On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Ram K <lambu999@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> We had an architect with an MBA from a top school who overrode most of us
> in the DBA/admin teams and made the decision to choose 32 bit Windows for
> running oracle RAC for an application that was to support thousands of
> users.
>
> On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 1:50 PM, MacGregor, Ian A. 
> <ian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> The architect is involved in  putting together what machines are needed
>> for a project,  what OS  they should run,  what application server should be
>> used,   and what database management system   He is mainly a collector if
>> information.  However if the OS team wants to run LINUX and the database
>> team wants to run Solaris,   he would make the decision on which way to go.
>>
>> The architect has too look at all the projects and design a cost-effective
>>  strategy for them all.   He is usually not i  the chain of command, but has
>>  the power to make decisions as discussed above.
>>
>>
>> On Jul 14, 2010, at 11:11 AM, <Laimutis.Nedzinskas@xxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> > I ment a job title. where does this this guy stand  in a command chain
>> and
>> > what good does he produce. Architect sounds like a person who knows a
>> lot
>> > but nothing in particular.
>> >
>> >
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >
>> > Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks,
> Ram.
>



-- 
Andrew W. Kerber

'If at first you dont succeed, dont take up skydiving.'

Other related posts: