Re: (no subject)
- From: Tim Gorman <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 11:04:06 -0600
Prem,
Obviously, you can choose any file size from 0 to 16tb, but I imagine that
what you are seeking is a reason to choose any one size over another?
Might I suggest that the speed at which your tape subsystem can backup and
restore a file determine the most desirable maximum size?
Most backup mechanisms devote only one process to each datafile during
backup and during restore. Parallelism can be achieved by opening multiple
such processes on multiple datafiles and multiple tape drives, but the
essential atomic unit of backup/restore is the datafile.
So look at the size of the datafile as determining the fastest possible
backup/restore operation.
If you make your database out of four 1tb files, then the fastest possible
backup/restore operation will be however long it takes to backup/restore
1tb. Even if you have only one 1tb file, then the fastest full database
backup/restore operation would still be constrained by how long it takes to
read/write that 1tb file.
With that in mind, you should conclude that it makes a whole lot more sense
to construct that tablespace of 1tb out of 128 8gb datafiles, instead of on=
e
1tb datafile. Both sizes (1tb and 8gb) are feasible from the file-system/O=
S
perspective, but 8gb has the advantage of enabling more parallelism during
backup/restore or file-copy operations.
So, to determine whether 2gb, 4gb, 8gb, 16gb, or 1tb is the best file size,
I suggest that you conduct some testing on backing up and then restoring
files of those sizes, and then choose according to the most desirable ratio
of timing to throughput.
Or, just do what I do and arbitrarily choose "8gb" as the largest datafile
size... :-)
Just my $0.02...
Hope this helps!
-Tim
on 6/30/04 3:19 AM, Prem Khanna J at premj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> Thanks All.=20
> we use JFS2 (on AIX5.2L).
> AIX docs say that it supports files as large as 16TB.
> that's too large.
>=20
> Raj>We have used 16GB at times ... but we use sushi files
> (raw not cooked)
>=20
> Raj,Hope u were in Japan for a while ;)
>=20
> from your experience, any suggestions for JFS2 ??
> 2GB or 4GB or 8GB .... ?!!!
>=20
> Thanks and Regards,
> Prem.
>=20
> =A0
>=20
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
> ----------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
> --
> Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
> FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>=20
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
----------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-----------------------------------------------------------------
- References:
- (no subject)
- From: Prem Khanna J
Other related posts:
- » [Fwd: PeopleSoft Financials 9.0 Upgrade Questions]
- » (no subject)
- » [no subject]
- » [Fwd: Hotsos Symposium Room Block Expires Feb. 23]
- » [no subject]
- » Re:
- » [Fwd: Re: Partitioning problems - Oracle 8.1.7.4]
- » **
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » [Fwd: Your e-mail message was blocked]
- » [no subject]
- » RE:
- » (no subject)
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » [no subject]
- » (no subject)
- » [no subject]
- » [Fwd: Re: Anyone running JFS2 Concurrent I/O with 9i on AIX 5.2?]
- » (без темы)
- » [Fwd: Re: Useful Oracle books]
- » Re:
- » (no subject)
- » Re: (no subject)
- » RE: (no subject)
- » RE: (no subject)
- » Re: (no subject)
- » [no subject]
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » [Fwd: RE:]
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » [Fwd: Re: Oracle 10g RAC on Linux - hardware confusion #@$!]
- » (no subject)
- » [Fwd: Re: I may never see this again. SGA]
- » [Fwd: RE: Has the Lists 'Mission Statement' Changed???]
- » [Fwd: Re: IDE for Oracle database]
- » [Fwd: RE: Job Scheduling Tool]
- » (no subject)
- » Re: (no subject)
- » [Fwd: Re: System Statistics and the CBO]
- » `
- » (no subject)
- » [Fwd: Re: Quick question re outer joins]
- » [Fwd: more on 'high cpu...']
- » Re:
- » Re:
- » [Fwd: Re: ANNOUNCE: Advanced DBI tutorial slides]
- » (no subject)
- » RE: (no subject)
- » Re: (no subject)
- » RE: (no subject)
- » [no subject]
- » Re:
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » [Fwd: Re: 10046 trace - unaccounted for time]
- » (no subject)
- » [no subject]
- » RE:
- » RE:
- » [stellr: Re: SUSE or Red Hat]
- » [Fwd: Re: Ora Doc in PDA]
- » [Fwd: Re: BAST in RAC]
- » (no subject)
- » [Fwd: Memorial Services for Stan Yellott]
- » [Fwd: Re: Altering dymanic SGA parameters and ORA-00376]
- » 試過跟學姊一起洗香香ㄇ....(限) - dba1 mcc
- » Re: - David Cheyne
- » Re: - Riyaj Shamsudeen
- » [Fwd: passwords in different instances] - Ingrid Voigt
- (no subject)
- From: Prem Khanna J