Re: mysql
- From: Walt Weaver <weaver1308@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: oracle_l <ORACLE-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2005 15:02:38 -0600
On Apr 4, 2005 12:54 PM, stephen booth <stephenbooth.uk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Apr 4, 2005 7:11 PM, David <thump@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > What are the largest pros and cons involved in discussing mysql versus
> > Oracle?
>
> MySQL doesn't have the recoverability features of Oracle, you lose a
> disk and you've lost everything since the last backup.
Not true. MySQL binlogs are similar to Oracle redo logs and can be
used for point-in-time recovery. We have over 200 MySQL databases
running 4.x with binlogs and replication and have experienced no data
loss from server crashes.
>
> MySQL scaling is a joke.
It certainly isn't in Oracle's league as far as scalaility is concerned.
>
> Stephen
>
--Walt Weaver
Bozeman, Montana
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: mysql
- From: Ellis R. Miller
- References:
- SGA Memory Corruption in 9.2.0.6
- From: Patty . Charlebois
- mysql
- From: David
- Re: mysql
- From: stephen booth
Other related posts:
- RE: mysql
- From: Ellis R. Miller
- SGA Memory Corruption in 9.2.0.6
- From: Patty . Charlebois
- mysql
- From: David
- Re: mysql
- From: stephen booth