I vote to take it off the subject. Filtering based on the "To" should do. HTH GovindanK Quoting babette.turnerunderwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > I agree with Jack > I filter on the "to" field and Outlook catches it fine. > > Babette Turner-Underwood > w > > > -----Original Message----- > From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx = > [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of = > JApplewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Sent: 2004-01-23 10:37 AM > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration > > > I vote to take it off. I have my Lotus Notes filter on the To field,=20 > checking for Oracle-L and dumping those emails in my Oracle-L box. = > Works=20 > fine for our new Freelists home. > > Jack C. Applewhite - Database Administrator > Austin (Texas) Independent School District > 512.414.9715 (wk) > 512.935.5929 (pager, 5129355929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) > JApplewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > > Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxxx> > Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > 01/23/2004 09:05 AM > Please respond to oracle-l > > =20 > To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > cc:=20 > Subject: [oracle-l] list configuration > > > > I've been asked if I can remove the [oracle-l] from the subject header. > > A: probably. Just don't have time to do it for a day or so. > > Any other issues, let me know. > > Jared > > > > > > > > > > Tevi gaida Persijas princis Tikssanaas vieta un aizrautiiga laika pavadiissana http://games.inbox.lv