I could care less. *-) Dick Goulet Senior Oracle DBA Oracle Certified 8i DBA -----Original Message----- From: babette.turnerunderwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:babette.turnerunderwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:46 PM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration I agree with Jack I filter on the "to" field and Outlook catches it fine. Babette Turner-Underwood w -----Original Message----- From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =3D [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of =3D JApplewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent: 2004-01-23 10:37 AM To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration I vote to take it off. I have my Lotus Notes filter on the To = field,=3D20 checking for Oracle-L and dumping those emails in my Oracle-L box. =3D Works=3D20 fine for our new Freelists home. Jack C. Applewhite - Database Administrator Austin (Texas) Independent School District 512.414.9715 (wk) 512.935.5929 (pager, 5129355929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) JApplewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxxx> Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 01/23/2004 09:05 AM Please respond to oracle-l =3D20 To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx cc:=3D20 Subject: [oracle-l] list configuration I've been asked if I can remove the [oracle-l] from the subject header. A: probably. Just don't have time to do it for a day or so. Any other issues, let me know. Jared