[oracle-l] Re: list configuration

  • From: "Goulet, Dick" <DGoulet@xxxxxxxx>
  • To: <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2004 13:48:04 -0500

I could care less. *-)

Dick Goulet
Senior Oracle DBA
Oracle Certified 8i DBA

-----Original Message-----
From: babette.turnerunderwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:babette.turnerunderwood@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 1:46 PM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration


I agree with Jack
I filter on the "to" field and Outlook catches it fine.

Babette Turner-Underwood
w


-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx =3D
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of =3D
JApplewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 2004-01-23 10:37 AM
To: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [oracle-l] Re: list configuration


I vote to take it off.  I have my Lotus Notes filter on the To =
field,=3D20
checking for Oracle-L and dumping those emails in my Oracle-L box.  =3D
Works=3D20
fine for our new Freelists home.

Jack C. Applewhite - Database Administrator
Austin (Texas) Independent School District
512.414.9715 (wk)
512.935.5929 (pager, 5129355929@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
JApplewhite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx





Jared Still <jkstill@xxxxxxxxxx>
Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
01/23/2004 09:05 AM
Please respond to oracle-l

=3D20
        To:     oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
        cc:=3D20
        Subject:        [oracle-l] list configuration



I've been asked if I can remove the [oracle-l] from the subject header.

A:  probably.  Just don't have time to do it for a day or so.

Any other issues, let me know.

Jared









Other related posts: