Re: impdp performance

The alternative would presumably be to extract the ddl beforehand with
dbms_metadata, you can then conditionally add parallel or not. Then run your
script afterwards.

On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Ram Raman <veeeraman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Thanks Yechiel, That is what I did last time. I wanted to check if there
> was something new.
>
> It was not a little edit though. It was not just search and replace. The
> index definitions of some indexes had parallel already built in them, which
> caused them to fail after I added my own parallel clause. I guess I will do
> it that way.
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:32 AM, Yechiel Adar <adar666@xxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:
>
>> You can use impdp with:
>> sqlfile=index.sql,include=index
>> to get the sql to create all the indexes.
>>
>> A little edit will make all the create index no logging and parallel ans
>> analyzed.
>> You get additional bonus as you can then split the index creation to 3-4
>> parts and run them in parallel.
>>
>> Adar Yechiel
>> Rechovot, Israel
>>
>>
>>
>> Ram Raman wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>  We have about 50,000 indexes in this schema. If I exclude indexes during
>>> import and decide to create them later using Nologging and parallel options,
>>> do I need to extract the index DDLs for each of the indexes and modify the
>>> DDL for each of them or is there any quick way to set it for all indexes.  v
>>> 10g.  I used a parallelism of 8.
>>> Thanks.
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info

Other related posts: