RE: how can you protect read-only indexes?

Read only has to do with dml, has nothing to do with ddl.

Waleed

-----Original Message-----
From: jungwolf [mailto:spatenau@xxxxxxxxx]=20
Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2005 4:35 PM
To: Khedr, Waleed
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: how can you protect read-only indexes?


On Thu, 3 Mar 2005 14:52:15 -0500, Khedr, Waleed <Waleed.Khedr@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
> I know I'm not answering your question, but I have to say that you
need
> to fix the processes themselves that are causing these issues.
> Also why does the process drop the indexes if it failed truncating the
> table.
> You need to defined some dependencies and abort mechanisms.
>=20
> Regards,
>=20
> Waleed

Well, of course the process needs to be reconfigured but that's not
the point at all.  The point is, why are objects in a readonly
tablespace vulnerable to being dropped?  That's counterintuitive
behavior even if it does make sense after thinking about the
implementation.  I think the original poster was asking if she can
make readonly tablespaces act with the expected behavior.

The best idea I've seen has been the trigger option from Juan.  I
haven't looked at triggers at the DB level so I'm not sure how much
security it'll provide, but at least it holds promise.  For example:
SQL> create trigger boo
  before drop
  on database
DECLARE
  eERROR exception;
begin
  raise eerror;
end;
/
  2    3    4    5    6    7    8    9
Trigger created.

SQL> create table boojam (a number);

Table created.

SQL> drop table boojam;
drop table boojam
*
ERROR at line 1:
ORA-00604: error occurred at recursive SQL level 1
ORA-06510: PL/SQL: unhandled user-defined exception
ORA-06512: at line 4

Just needs a lot of spiffing up.

Steven
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l

Other related posts: