Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- From: "Niall Litchfield" <niall.litchfield@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 30 Jun 2006 06:37:39 +0100
On 6/30/06, Mladen Gogala <gogala@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It's not indeterministic, but is extremely complex and its very hard to predict
the output. What I really need is a "use an index if it exists" parameter that
Oracle doesn't want to give us.
That sounds rather like the /*+ INDEX table_alias(colum list) */ hint
that is available with 10.1 and above to me.
--
Niall Litchfield
Oracle DBA
http://www.orawin.info
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- From: Laimutis . Nedzinskas
- RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- From: Mladen Gogala
Other related posts:
- » full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- » RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
It's not indeterministic, but is extremely complex and its very hard to predict the output. What I really need is a "use an index if it exists" parameter that Oracle doesn't want to give us.
That sounds rather like the /*+ INDEX table_alias(colum list) */ hint that is available with 10.1 and above to me. -- Niall Litchfield Oracle DBA http://www.orawin.info -- http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- From: Laimutis . Nedzinskas
- RE: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- From: Wolfgang Breitling
- Re: full-scan vs index for "small" tables
- From: Mladen Gogala