RE: flush shared_pool and query performance
- From: genegurevich@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- To: "Allen, Brandon" <Brandon.Allen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2008 09:15:14 -0500
Cursor_sharing is set to exact:
17:31:00 EGUREV1 @dccs05 >show parameter cursor
cursor_sharing string EXACT
cursor_space_for_time boolean TRUE
open_cursors integer 300
session_cached_cursors integer 50
thank you
Gene Gurevich
"Allen, Brandon"
<Brandon.Allen@On
eNeck.com> To
<genegurevich@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
04/03/2008 06:15 <oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
PM cc
Subject
RE: flush shared_pool and query
performance
Do you have the parameter cursor_sharing=similar set?
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
genegurevich@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Why would the third SQL complete that fast. I have a different SQL
because of the value 4567 (and I don't use bind variables), so shouldn't
this be a hard parse too?
Privileged/Confidential Information may be contained in this message or
attachments hereto. Please advise immediately if you or your employer do
not consent to Internet email for messages of this kind. Opinions,
conclusions and other information in this message that do not relate to the
official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor
endorsed by it.
--
//www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
Other related posts:
